Galxe and Zealy quest design: tasks, checks, and reward rules

What should the campaign brief record before platform setup?

The campaign brief records the audience, intended action, evidence, and reward owner. Those inputs determine whether a quest is useful and reviewable. Start with the behavior the project wants to encourage. Then identify the evidence that would show a participant completed that action.

Our planning worksheet uses 5 fields: audience, goal, task, completion evidence, and follow-up. Keep each field specific. “Grow the community” is not a reviewable goal. “Help new users understand a product feature” points toward a task and a way to assess it. A team focused on ongoing participation can connect the brief to a broader community engagement plan.

Before opening Galxe or Zealy, write down:

• The audience and the reason they should take part.
• The action expected from each participant.
• The evidence a reviewer can inspect.
• The person responsible for questions and reward delivery.
• The outcome the team will assess after close.

This brief also helps remove tasks that add effort without serving the goal. Keep the campaign promise narrow enough to explain in one sentence. If the campaign has multiple audiences, record which task serves each one. The brief becomes the reference for task copy, review decisions, and the final readout.

Which Galxe or Zealy format fits the task evidence?

The platform comparison should begin with the task and its evidence, not with a preferred brand. Record what participants must do, how completion can be checked, and what support the team can provide. Then compare that workflow with the options currently available in the project’s Galxe or Zealy account.

Use a platform-fit sheet with 3 columns: participant action, available completion flow, and reviewer responsibility. This makes gaps visible before publication. A task with a clear platform-supported completion flow may need less manual review. A task based on a written response needs an owner and an acceptance rule. Confirm the available options in the account before finalizing the participant journey.

Check these points for each proposed task:

• Can the instruction fit the platform’s available task format?
• Is completion checked by a platform option, a project reviewer, or both?
• Can participants see how they qualify and receive a reward?
• Can the team handle questions and review work during the campaign?

For community-bound tasks, map the transition from quest page to destination. The Discord setup guide can help clarify channel access and participant onboarding. For reward or token-related participation, keep campaign language aligned with the project’s wider quest campaign service scope. Recheck platform options before publishing, since account availability and current product details are visible to the project team.

How should each quest task define completion evidence?

A task card needs two artifacts: participant instructions and a separate review rule. The instructions tell people what to do. The review rule tells the team what counts as valid completion. Keeping these artifacts separate prevents vague copy from becoming an improvised review standard.

Use 4 task fields: action, destination, evidence, and next step. State one action in direct language. Link to the intended page or channel. Explain what evidence is required, if any. Then describe where participants can find reward information. Make prerequisites visible before someone starts, especially when a wallet, account, or product access is needed.

A review rule should answer practical questions:

• What evidence is acceptable for this task?
• Who checks entries that need manual review?
• How will incomplete or unclear submissions be handled?
• Where can participants ask for help?

Test every task from a participant’s perspective. Follow the link, complete the stated action, and check whether the completion rule can be applied consistently. Separate optional actions from required ones. Avoid collecting information that does not help assess completion. For product education, use a short knowledge check tied to material participants can access. For community participation, define the contribution expected rather than asking for general support. Clear task copy reduces avoidable questions and gives reviewers a repeatable standard.

Which Sybil checks fit the risk of each quest?

The risk record should connect each task to a specific abuse path and a proportionate check. No single signal establishes that every entry represents a distinct person. The practical aim is to make completion meaningful while keeping the published participant journey understandable.

Start with the reward and action. Repeated low-effort actions may need different checks from a task that requires a relevant product interaction. Define account or wallet eligibility before launch. Decide whether repeat entries can qualify and who handles exceptions. If a task involves submitted information, limit access to the people who need it for review.

Use this 3-part review:

• Risk: identify the behavior that could undermine the task.
• Check: specify the evidence or review that addresses it.
• Handling: record how reviewers resolve unusual entries.

Avoid adding a check merely because it sounds strict. A useful control addresses a named risk and has a clear owner. Keep review criteria consistent across participants. Record decisions so the team can explain how rules were applied. If personal information is genuinely necessary, explain the reason and follow the project’s handling policy. Do not make identity checks a default substitute for task-specific evidence. The right control is the smallest one that supports a defensible review and a clear participant experience.

What reward details belong on the Galxe or Zealy quest page?

The reward record should state what participants may receive, how they qualify, and how delivery works. Participants need those terms before starting. Keep the same wording on the quest page, community announcements, and campaign materials so that eligibility does not shift between channels.

For each reward, document 4 items: description, qualification rule, distribution owner, and claim instructions. Say whether the reward is a credential, access, recognition, or a project-defined asset. If a digital asset is involved, explain the allocation process and claim route. Make sure a named team member can carry out the stated process.

Before publication, check:

• Are eligibility rules visible before the task begins?
• Do the task and reward descriptions use consistent terms?
• Is there a clear contact route for missed claims or corrections?
• Can the project deliver the reward under the published conditions?

Avoid language that suggests a reward is an investment or implies future value. Keep exceptions limited and explain them plainly. A concise set of rules is easier to administer than a long set of special cases. For scope factors and cost questions, see Galxe and Zealy quest campaign pricing. Treat reward delivery as part of the campaign journey, not a separate announcement added after participants finish.

What should the team check during launch and closeout?

The launch checklist tracks task copy, destinations, completion rules, support ownership, and reward terms. Assign a person to each responsibility before publication. Our workflow uses 2 review passes: one checks participant instructions, and the other checks completion and reward rules. This separation catches unclear copy before it becomes a dispute.

Before launch, test every link and follow the full participant journey. Confirm that reviewers can access the evidence they need. Give support staff the published rules and an escalation route. During the campaign, record recurring questions and unclear steps. If wording must change, explain the change clearly and resolve existing entries fairly.

The final pass checks 3 checkpoints: links, completion evidence, and reward instructions.

At close, review submissions against the published criteria. Record exceptions and follow through on reward communication. The closeout readout should separate activity from evidence of the project goal. Include which tasks were completed, where participants needed help, what review issues appeared, and what the team should change next time.

A completion count alone does not establish retention or product adoption. Use the intended behavior from the brief as the reference point. If creator activity supports the campaign, coordinate messages with the guide to running a crypto KOL campaign. Keep those messages consistent with actual task and reward terms. This readout gives the next planning cycle a record of decisions, not just a list of activity.

Which Galxe and Zealy decisions remain outside campaign control?

The campaign record can show what the project designed, published, reviewed, and delivered. Galxe and Zealy retain control over their own account rules, task availability, and platform decisions. An outside adviser cannot promise acceptance of a format, campaign visibility, participation volume, or a particular platform response.

Before launch, check current account requirements and keep copies of approved wording, completion criteria, and platform communications. Assign one owner to track questions or changes. This gives the team a consistent reference when participant instructions or platform options need attention.

For a final readiness check, gather the brief, draft tasks, reward terms, and review rules in one folder. GeoMarketing Experts can review those materials, flag unclear instructions, and map each task to a practical completion check. Send the brief and the platform you are considering through the contact page. The next step is a scoped review of the campaign plan.

How it works

1. Record the campaign goalName the audience, intended behavior, and evidence that would make the activity useful.
2. Check platform fitCompare the task journey and review needs with the options available in Galxe or Zealy.
3. Write tasks and reward rulesPrepare participant copy, completion criteria, eligibility terms, and distribution instructions.
4. Test the participant journeyFollow every instruction, check destinations, and confirm that reviewers can apply the rules.
5. Review and close the campaignHandle questions consistently, assess submissions against published criteria, and record the closeout readout.