Which fields make a delivery promise checkable?
Five fields make a delivery commitment auditable: platform, deliverable, window, proof, and remedy. GeoMarketing Experts checks these fields before campaign approval, then records the same wording for the client and account lead.
The scope should name the actual work. Examples include a booked visibility placement, a content item, or a defined submission task. “Campaign support” alone does not identify a deliverable. Use the how we work page to compare scope with operating steps, then ask for vague items to be rewritten.
A practical scope record contains:
- Platform and placement: the location or channel named in the order.
- Deliverable: the booked placement, content, or task.
- Window: the agreed schedule or delivery period.
- Evidence: a link, dated capture, publication confirmation, or completion note.
- Remedy trigger: the missed item that qualifies for review.
Check all 5 fields against the proposal before paying. If one field is absent, request exact wording in the order. That creates a shared reference for reviewing delivery.
What belongs in a placement proof record?
A placement record pairs each deliverable with an agreed proof artifact. You should know who collects it and when it will be shared, before the campaign begins.
For each line item, record the evidence format and where it will be stored. A live link can identify a published placement. A dated capture or publication confirmation can document an item when a link is unavailable. A completion note should identify the work performed, not just say that the campaign finished.
Our account lead can review the order against the proof record at 2 checkpoints: before work starts and when delivery is reported. The record can include 4 details for each item: its scope wording, evidence type, collection owner, and review status. Keep those details together so the client can trace each proof artifact to the correct commitment.
The case studies page shows the kind of reporting to inspect when assessing an agency. For your own campaign, ask for project-specific evidence. A general example does not verify your placement.
How should a missed deliverable be resolved?
A remedy entry should identify the missed item, review route, and available resolution. Put those terms in the written order before payment, rather than relying on a general campaign description.
Check these 3 points in the remedy wording:
- Trigger: which uncompleted deliverable qualifies for review.
- Resolution: whether the order offers a make-good, refund, or another written arrangement.
- Request process: what evidence to send and who reviews it.
For a make-good, state whether replacement work must use the original platform and format, or whether both sides may agree on an alternative. For a refund, state how it is calculated and requested if that remedy is offered. Also record how missing assets or late approvals affect the agreed schedule.
Read the terms of service alongside the order. If they appear unclear, request written clarification before proceeding. Compare the proposed work with pricing to understand what the order assigns to each deliverable. The written scope, not an assumed policy, is the reference for resolving a delivery concern.
Where does a platform record stop?
A platform record can show submitted work or a visible placement at a point in time. It cannot transfer platform decisions to the client or agency.
For CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, separate agreed submission or campaign work from the platform’s own listing review. For trending placements, record what was booked and what evidence was supplied. Do not treat a screenshot as a promise that the placement will remain visible.
Those platforms control listing reviews and whether trending placements remain visible. The agreement can cover our submitted work or booked placement, not their review decision, continued display, token price, or virality.
If the reported work differs from the order, send the relevant line item and evidence to the account lead. The team can compare both records and apply the remedy written in the order. For a review, send GeoMarketing Experts your proposed scope, platform list, and preferred proof format. We will identify unclear commitments and return specific wording for approval. The contact page is the next step.
Frequently asked questions
Which details should the order include before I approve it?
Ask for the platform, named deliverable, delivery window, proof format, and remedy trigger. Those 5 fields let you compare the proposal with the final delivery record. If a phrase such as “campaign support” does not identify the work, ask for a concrete item in the written order.
What evidence should accompany a completed placement?
Agree on one proof artifact for each deliverable. That could be a live link, dated capture, publication confirmation, or a completion note describing the work. The record should also name who collects it and when you receive it, so each artifact maps back to the relevant order line.
How do I know whether a make-good or refund applies?
The written order determines which missed items qualify and what remedy is available. Check the trigger, resolution, and request process before payment. If a make-good is offered, ask what replacement work counts. If a refund is offered, ask how it is calculated and requested.
Does a placement record mean CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap approved it?
No. A record can document agreed submission work or evidence of a booked placement. CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap control their listing reviews, while visibility for trending placements can change. The order should describe our work and proof separately from those platform decisions.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…